For 15–18-year-olds
University admission
The application done properly, a real piece of work that makes it genuinely theirs, and honest judgment on where to apply and why.
Get in touch →School → university → first career
Most admissions help arrives weeks before a deadline, when nothing about the candidate can change. Start earlier, one chapter at a time, and there is time to build something real, close the gaps, and leave with more options than you started with.
What’s in front of you?
Get in touchRon replies within two working days. One chapter at a time; stop after any.
What happens next
For 15–18-year-olds
The application done properly, a real piece of work that makes it genuinely theirs, and honest judgment on where to apply and why.
Get in touch →For 15–22-year-olds · one real piece of work, theirs
Your child chooses a problem they actually care about — it doesn’t have to be code — and builds one substantial piece of real work they can show, explain and stand behind, with real users as the aim — and a real ask made of someone who can say no.
Employers ask for experience, and experience comes from employment. The Project is the way out of that loop, years early.
Read about the Project →For graduates and young professionals
Written to you, not your parents: the application, a piece of work that proves the direction, and a straight answer on whether the degree is worth it at all.
For adults: read your page →How this differs from an admissions consultant
A consultant usually arrives weeks before the deadline, when nothing about the candidate can change, so all that is left to work on is how it is presented. We start a year or more out, while there is still time to build something real, close a gap, and choose a direction for a reason — so the application is strong because what is behind it is.
Their work ends at the letter, and is judged by it. Ours is the same person through the years after — the course, the first job. We are paid by your family and by no one else, and we say when the honest answer is “don’t apply”.
Employers have not stopped hiring young people. What changed is the queue. Applications per opening are at levels nobody has seen before, and the roles that are growing skew senior. What gets a young person out of a queue that long is not a better application. It is work they can point to and answer questions about.
Nobody can forecast the world your child will graduate into, and we are wary of people who claim to. What can already be seen is that written applications carry less information than they used to, because everyone’s are now polished the same way — and that employers and admissions readers are responding by putting more weight on what someone can prove in person.
One real piece of work, the trail of decisions behind it, and the ability to answer for it unassisted is what survives that shift. It is also what makes an application true.
Each chapter hands more of the work to your child than the one before it, on purpose. Nothing renews on its own, there is no membership, and we are not trying to still be here in five years.
The measure we care about is how much less help your child needs by the end of a chapter than at the start — and we say so plainly at the close, including when the answer is not much yet. A guide who is still indispensable after five years has failed at the thing they were for.
Every family starts here · 2–3 weeks
Two weeks with Ron before you commit to anything. You leave with a one-page decision — and Ron will say if he is not the right person to help.
Elsewhere a first payment holds a place. This one buys a decision you keep and can act on, including the decision not to work with us.
Credited in full to your first chapter. Go on to a chapter, and the Compass has cost you nothing extra.
A structured inventory, a short piece of real work your child chooses and Ron reads with them, and a session. The one-page decision covers the next move, why, what your child builds toward, and what to stop spending on.
What the page looks like — illustrative, not a client
The decision: apply for economics in the UK next autumn, not the US this year.
Why: the profile is a year short of the US round; the UK round rewards depth in one subject, which she has.
Build toward: one piece of real work in economics with a real user, done by June.
Stop spending on: the second test-prep course and the summer programme.
Chapter · 4–6 weeks
$1,700 if it is not your first chapter
The application, done properly: where to apply and why, the statement and the story it rests on, and the choice when the offers come.
Three live sessions over four to six weeks, the work read between them, scoped to your deadline. You leave with an application your child can stand behind — and honest judgment on every call along the way.
Chapter · 10–12 weeks
$3,400 if it is not your first chapter
One substantial piece of real work, chosen by your child, built with AI as the tool, with real users as the aim.
Three live sessions with Ron, the work read every week, about five hours a week from them. What it is, what Ron does, what your child does, and what is not included are all on its page.
The Application Season · the path most families take
About $5,700 all in, with the Compass credited in full and every chapter after the first at the continuing price. Paid one chapter at a time, never up front; stop after any chapter. The larger chapters can be paid in two or three interest-free instalments.
When to start
Full-service admissions help is usually one large commitment, agreed near the deadline, when nothing about the candidate can still change. A single summer programme often costs more than the Project and leaves nothing your child can show afterwards. We publish what things cost, take them one chapter at a time, and credit the first one in full.
Opening prices. Every chapter after your first is 15% less, and that price is published rather than negotiated. Stop after any chapter, no penalty.
AI
Your child directs it and checks it; using it well still means choosing the problem, judging the output and owning the result. Nothing submitted is written by AI, and the process trail shows the work is theirs. We use it on our side for research and first drafts — never for the judgment you are paying for.
If you’re the one who’d be doing this

Ron Sircar · founder
Oxford MBA; over ten years in international development with the World Bank Group and UK Aid programmes across Africa and South Asia, mostly on the buyer’s side of the table — choosing the people and managing the teams that delivered the work.
How he works with your child. He sets the direction with them, not for them; reads what they produce every week and says plainly what is good and what is not; and makes the honest mid-course correction. He cannot decide the admission — no one honest can — but he is the person you call, at every step.
The limits.Where a piece of work needs a specialist — in a subject, a sector, or the admissions round itself — we bring one in around that accountability. Where we don’t know, we say so.
Send them the link. Add your name and we’ll know who to thank — and they’ll arrive as someone you vouched for rather than a stranger.
Tell us which application is in front of your child. We'll tell you honestly whether we can help — and if we can't, we'll say so.
With under-18s: a parent is welcome in any session, nothing happens on a channel you don’t know about, and your child can stop at any point.